Maryland Child Support Calculator
Calculate child support in Maryland from the state's own published guideline. The estimate adjusts for parenting time, health insurance, and childcare.
Last updated: Maryland filing fee checked ; other cost figures are our own estimates
Maryland divorces typically cost 24% less than the national average of $12,900.
Child Support in Maryland
- Formula
- Income Shares Model
- Top of the schedule
- $30,000/mo
- Equal parenting presumption, in our record
- No
- Property system, in our record
- Equitable distribution
Child Support Calculator in Maryland: What You Should Know
Maryland uses the Income Shares Model, combining both parents' actual monthly incomes to find the basic support obligation, which is then divided in proportion to each parent's share. This calculator reads that obligation from the state's own schedule at Md. Code, Fam. Law 12-204(e) rather than from a national model. The schedule runs to $30,000 of combined adjusted actual monthly income, and what the statute says above that is one sentence and the whole provision: under 12-204(d) the court "may use its discretion in setting the amount of child support". No clause makes the top row a minimum and nothing caps the award, so the discretion runs in both directions. Between two rows, 12-204(c) sends the reading to the next HIGHER row rather than averaging, so nothing here is interpolated. Where each parent has the children at least 92 overnights a year, 12-204(m) runs a different calculation entirely, and 12-204(g) and (h)(1) add work-related childcare and health insurance to the obligation before it is divided. Extraordinary medical costs are added the same way under 12-204(h)(2), but this form has no field for them, so they are not in the figure.
Key point: Maryland's schedule runs to $30,000 of combined adjusted actual monthly income. Above it the court has discretion with no direction attached, so the figure at the top row is neither a floor you can count on nor a limit.
Tell us the basics
Locked to Maryland on this page.
Use your gross (before-tax) monthly income. If you are paid annually, divide by 12.
Use their gross (before-tax) monthly income. If they are paid annually, divide by 12.
This helps us describe how income is treated. It does not change the estimate: we calculate on the income figures you entered and do not impute income to anyone.
This estimate is for planning purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult a licensed family law attorney in your state for guidance specific to your situation.
How Maryland calculates child support
Maryland sets child support with the Income Shares Model, and we have read the guideline that says so, which means both parents' incomes are combined, and each parent covers the share of the total obligation that matches their share of that combined income. Here is what that looks like in practice.
Calculated from the state's published guideline
Maryland is calculated from the state's own schedule of basic child support obligations, printed inside the statute at Md. Code, Fam. Law § 12-204(e) rather than published separately by an agency. The first row is a band, "0-1200", and every row after it is a single income figure, 577 rows in all running to $30,000 of combined adjusted actual monthly income in $50 steps, six child columns wide. The whole table was extracted three independent ways - from the served statute page, and twice more from the General Assembly's own PDF of the same section using two decoders, one of which does no column detection at all - and all three agree on every one of its 3,462 cells. Nine rows were then read out of the document by eye, every column of each, as a separate check.
How Maryland reads its own table is set out in the statute and it is not what most states do. § 12-204(c): "if a combined adjusted actual income amount falls between amounts shown in the schedule, the basic child support amount shall be extrapolated to the next higher amount." Nothing is averaged between two rows. An income falling between them takes the HIGHER row's figure, so the amount steps up at each row rather than sliding, and every number this page produces is one the state prints rather than one worked out between two of them. That is worth knowing if you are comparing with a neighbour: Virginia's statute uses the same word, "extrapolated", and means the opposite thing by it, because Virginia does not say where to extrapolate to.
The income the schedule is read at is Maryland's own term and it is neither gross pay nor take-home pay. § 12-201(b) defines "actual income" as income from any source and lists sixteen of them, with no tax taken out anywhere, so it is a PRE-TAX figure and there is no conversion standing between your numbers and the state's table. Every state this site has transcribed whose guideline is keyed to net income carries a paragraph about which way that substitution pushes the figure, and this one does not need it. § 12-201(c)(1) then subtracts exactly three things: support you already pay under another order, which this calculator asks you for; alimony you actually pay, which it does not; and an allowance for your own other children living with you, which it does not. Neither missing deduction can raise anybody's adjusted actual income, so the OBLIGATION the schedule gives is higher than a Maryland court would reach wherever one of them applies.
What that does to the amount YOU owe is a different question, and it does not have one answer. § 12-204(a)(1) divides the obligation "in proportion to their adjusted actual incomes", so the split comes from both parents' figures. A missing deduction on your side lowers the schedule row and lowers your share, and both push our number high. One on the other parent's side lowers the row and RAISES your share of what is left, which pushes the other way, and neither deduction scales with income: alimony actually paid is a fixed obligation and the other-children allowance is a second reading of this same schedule at that parent's income by itself. This form asks about neither, so the calculator cannot tell which case you are in. The obligation being shared is too high in every case; the share of it is the part we cannot put a direction on. On the shared physical custody route it reaches further still, because § 12-204(m)(3) pays over the DIFFERENCE between two figures rather than a share of one, and where the result is $0 for you an unseen deduction on the other side can change which of you is the payor.
Your overnight count moves this number, and Maryland is the only state on this site that softens its own threshold. § 12-201(o)(1) switches the case onto a different calculation where "each parent keeps the child or children overnight for more than 25% of the year", which § 12-204(m)(2)(ii)1 glosses as at least 92 overnights - and the test runs on EACH parent, so a schedule giving one parent most of the year keeps the case on the ordinary calculation. Above the line the basic obligation is multiplied by 1.5 under § 12-204(f), split by income share, and weighted by the share of the year the children spend with the other parent. What no other state here does is § 12-204(m)(2)(ii)2: a parent between 92 and 109 overnights has their own figure increased again, by 10 percent at 92 to 94 nights, then 8, 6, 4 and 2 as their time rises, fading to nothing at 110. It is a cliff with a ramp built over it.
Two rules the shared calculation carries that are easy to miss. § 12-204(m)(5) says the amount owed "may not exceed the amount that would be owed under subsection (l)", so the shared figure can never come out above the ordinary one, and where the arithmetic says otherwise this page shows the ordinary figure and tells you the cap has bitten. And § 12-201(o)(1) has a second condition beside the overnights, that "both parents contribute to the expenses of the child or children in addition to the payment of child support". That is a finding about your household rather than anything a calculator can see, so we assume it is met wherever the overnight test is and say so on the result.
The self-support reserve is already inside these figures rather than applied on top of them, and the asterisks in the statute are how you can tell. § 12-201(e) defines the basic obligation as the schedule amount "as adjusted by the self-support reserve", and § 12-204(e)'s caption says an asterisk marks an obligation the reserve has been applied to. Those marks survive into the text, which is not something to take for granted - Pennsylvania draws the same distinction with SHADING on a printed table, and shading is not a character, so that rule cannot be transcribed at all. What Maryland's reserve aims at, in § 12-201(n)'s words, is that a paying parent keeps at least "110% of the 2019 federal poverty level for an individual" after support, income taxes and FICA. We quote that rather than working it out: the test is pinned to the 2019 guideline by statute rather than to the current year's, and nobody here has read the 2019 figure, so a dollar amount for it would be ours rather than Maryland's.
At the top the schedule stops at $30,000 and Maryland is the one state here whose rule above the line points in no direction at all. § 12-204(d) is a single sentence giving the court discretion, with no clause making the top row a minimum and nothing capping the award. So for a family above it we show what the schedule produces at its highest level, $3,163 for one child rising to $7,020 for six, and we do not tell you which end of a range it sits at, because the statute does not. The schedule itself took effect on July 1, 2022 under 2021 HB 1339, Chapter 305, replacing one that stopped at $15,000, so any summary you find describing Maryland's schedule as ending at half the current figure is quoting the old table.
Two categories of cost sit outside this number by Maryland's own structure rather than by omission. Extraordinary medical expenses are added and divided by income share under § 12-204(h)(2), and § 12-201(g) defines them as uninsured medical costs over $250 in a calendar year, reaching orthodontia, dental and vision care, physical therapy, chronic health problems and counselling. Separately, § 12-204(i) lets private or special school costs and the cost of moving the children between two homes be divided in the same proportion "by agreement of the parties or by order of court" rather than automatically. This calculator has no field for either. And the guideline figure is a presumption throughout: § 12-202(a)(2) makes it the correct amount unless a party shows applying it "would be unjust or inappropriate in a particular case", and a court departing from it has to put in writing what the guidelines would have produced.
Source: Md. Code, Fam. Law § 12-204
The Income Shares Model starts from an estimate of what the children would have received had the household stayed intact, then splits that figure between the parents. The calculation runs in three steps. Both parents' monthly incomes are added together. A basic support obligation for that combined figure and that number of children is set by the state's own guideline. Each parent is then responsible for the percentage of the obligation that matches their percentage of the combined income.
Because the obligation is divided by income share rather than assigned to one side, the receiving parent's earnings matter as much as the paying parent's. A parent bringing in 70 percent of the combined income carries roughly 70 percent of the total obligation. The parent the children live with most is treated as already spending their share through daily care, so only the other parent's share is ordered as a payment. That is why closing the income gap between two parents lowers the payment even when neither parent's own income falls.
Four things are then layered on top of the base figure: health insurance premiums covering the children, work-related childcare, support already being paid under an earlier order for other children, and, in most states, the number of overnights each parent has.
The figure Maryland's own guideline works from is combined adjusted actual income, under Md. Code, Fam. Law § 12-201(b), (c) and (f).
What moves the number in Maryland
- Both parents' monthly incomes, and the gap between them
- Number of children covered by the order
- The paying parent's share of overnights
- Health insurance premiums covering the children
- Work-related childcare paid for the children
- Support already ordered for children from another relationship
Income limits and judicial discretion
Maryland's schedule stops at $30,000 of combined adjusted actual monthly income, and what the statute says above that is one sentence with no direction in it. Md. Code, Fam. Law § 12-204(d), in full: "if the combined adjusted actual income exceeds the highest level specified in the schedule in subsection (e) of this section, the court may use its discretion in setting the amount of child support." No clause makes the top row a minimum, nothing caps the award, and there is no formula for carrying the schedule further. That puts Maryland on its own here. Colorado, Illinois and Washington all make their top row a floor a court may exceed; New Mexico, Virginia, Florida and Pennsylvania keep computing by a published formula; Maryland does neither, and the discretion runs both ways. At that top row the obligation is $3,163 a month for one child and $7,020 for six, read from Maryland's own table. Two things about the number itself: it is COMBINED income rather than one parent's, so two earners each under the line can be over it together, and "adjusted actual" income is a pre-tax figure with three specific obligations taken out of it rather than take-home pay. The schedule took effect on July 1, 2022 under 2021 HB 1339, Chapter 305. Maryland gives judges a moderate amount of room on custody and parenting time, so expect the order to start from the guideline figure and move with the facts of the case.
Maryland child support examples
These three examples run through the same Maryland calculator on this page, so the figures match what the tool returns for the same entries. Each example changes one thing against the one before it, so you can see which lever moved the result. All three assume a standard schedule of 80 overnights a year with the paying parent, and Maryland's own parenting-time rule is applied to every figure below rather than left off it. At this count the rule does not reach, so these are complete guideline amounts rather than amounts waiting for an adjustment. The table further down the page is where the count starts to move the number, and it shows where.
Example 1: One child, standard schedule
The starting point: one child, a moderate income gap, and no insurance or childcare in the order yet.
- Paying parent
- $5,000/mo
- Other parent
- $3,000/mo
- Children
- 1
- Overnights
- 80/yr
Guideline result: $763 per month ($9,156 a year).
| Step | Amount |
|---|---|
| Your monthly actual income | $5,000 |
| Other parent's monthly actual income | $3,000 |
| Combined adjusted actual income | $8,000 |
| Basic support obligation, schedule at $8,000 | $1,221 |
| Your share of the total obligation (63% of combined adjusted actual income) | $763 |
- This is Maryland's ordinary calculation under § 12-204(l): the basic obligation from the schedule, plus work-related childcare under § 12-204(g) and health insurance under § 12-204(h)(1), divided between the parents in proportion to their adjusted actual incomes. On 80 overnights a year with you the other parent has 285, and the lower of the two, 80, does not reach the 92 that § 12-201(o) requires of EACH parent before the shared physical custody calculation applies. You are close to that line: 12 more overnights for the parent with fewer would move the case onto a different calculation entirely, and Maryland phases that step in rather than dropping it all at once.
- One thing Maryland makes easier than most states on this site, and one thing it does not. The schedule is read at "combined adjusted actual income", which § 12-201(b) defines as income from any source with no tax taken out of it, so there is no converting your gross pay to a net figure and no substituting one for the other. Every state on this site whose guideline is keyed to net income carries a paragraph about which way that substitution pushes the figure, and this one does not need it. What § 12-201(c)(1) does subtract, and this form has a field for only the first of, is: support you already pay under another order; alimony or maintenance you actually pay, which § 12-201(c)(1)(ii) subtracts from your income before the schedule is read; an allowance for your own other children living with you, which § 12-201(c)(1)(iii) allows where the child spends more than 92 overnights in your home, worked out by reading this same schedule at your income alone and taking 75 percent of the result under § 12-201(c)(2)(ii). Neither of the two we cannot collect can raise anybody's adjusted actual income, and Maryland's schedule never falls as income rises, so the basic obligation your calculation starts from is HIGHER than a Maryland court would reach wherever either of them applies.
- Your share of that obligation is the part we cannot put a direction on, and it is worth a sentence because it can pull the other way. § 12-204(a)(1) divides the obligation "in proportion to their adjusted actual incomes", so what you owe is set from BOTH parents' adjusted figures rather than from yours alone. Neither missing deduction scales with income: alimony actually paid is a fixed obligation, and the allowance for a parent's own other children is a second reading of this same schedule at that parent's income by itself, taken at 75 percent. So if it is the OTHER parent who pays alimony or supports a child at home, their adjusted income falls, the combined figure falls with it, and your share of what is left is bigger than the split we have used. Your own deductions and theirs push the answer opposite ways. This form asks about neither, so which case you are in is not something we can see. The obligation being shared is too high in every case; the share of it is the part we cannot put a direction on.
- Two categories of cost sit outside the figure above by Maryland's own structure. Extraordinary medical expenses are added to the obligation and divided by income share under § 12-204(h)(2), and § 12-201(g) defines them as uninsured medical costs over $250 in a calendar year, including orthodontia, dental and vision care, asthma treatment, physical therapy, treatment for a chronic health problem, and counselling or psychiatric therapy for a diagnosed mental disorder. Separately, § 12-204(i) lets private or special school expenses and the cost of transporting the children between your two homes be divided in the same proportion, "by agreement of the parties or by order of court" rather than automatically. This calculator has no field for either, so neither is in the number.
- The guideline figure is a presumption rather than a fixed amount. § 12-202(a)(2) makes the guidelines amount "the correct amount of child support to be awarded" unless a party shows that applying them "would be unjust or inappropriate in a particular case", and where a court departs it has to say so in writing and state what the guidelines would have produced. § 12-202(a)(2)(iii) lists what a court may weigh, including the terms of an existing settlement agreement, provisions for mortgages, marital debts or college expenses, and whether the order would leave the paying parent below 110 percent of the 2019 federal poverty level.
- The employment status you selected has not changed the estimate above. You had to answer to get here, and whichever answer you picked the figure is the same: we calculate on the income figures you entered and impute nothing to either parent. Courts can impute. Where a judge finds a parent voluntarily unemployed or under-employed, a court may set support on what that parent could earn rather than on what they currently bring in, and an imputed figure is set at or above actual earnings rather than below them. Which way that would move your case depends on whose income gets imputed, and that is the part we cannot answer for you: if it is the paying party's, the figure above tends to sit below what a court would order, and if it is the receiving party's it can move in either direction depending on the state and on the two incomes, so we do not put a direction on it. We have read the imputation provision in Illinois and in no other state, Maryland included, so nothing on this page is adjusted for one.
Example 2: Two children, same incomes
Identical to the first example except for a second child, which isolates what the second child is worth in this state.
- Paying parent
- $5,000/mo
- Other parent
- $3,000/mo
- Children
- 2
- Overnights
- 80/yr
Guideline result: $1,093 per month ($13,116 a year).
| Step | Amount |
|---|---|
| Your monthly actual income | $5,000 |
| Other parent's monthly actual income | $3,000 |
| Combined adjusted actual income | $8,000 |
| Basic support obligation, schedule at $8,000 | $1,748 |
| Your share of the total obligation (63% of combined adjusted actual income) | $1,093 |
- This is Maryland's ordinary calculation under § 12-204(l): the basic obligation from the schedule, plus work-related childcare under § 12-204(g) and health insurance under § 12-204(h)(1), divided between the parents in proportion to their adjusted actual incomes. On 80 overnights a year with you the other parent has 285, and the lower of the two, 80, does not reach the 92 that § 12-201(o) requires of EACH parent before the shared physical custody calculation applies. You are close to that line: 12 more overnights for the parent with fewer would move the case onto a different calculation entirely, and Maryland phases that step in rather than dropping it all at once.
- One thing Maryland makes easier than most states on this site, and one thing it does not. The schedule is read at "combined adjusted actual income", which § 12-201(b) defines as income from any source with no tax taken out of it, so there is no converting your gross pay to a net figure and no substituting one for the other. Every state on this site whose guideline is keyed to net income carries a paragraph about which way that substitution pushes the figure, and this one does not need it. What § 12-201(c)(1) does subtract, and this form has a field for only the first of, is: support you already pay under another order; alimony or maintenance you actually pay, which § 12-201(c)(1)(ii) subtracts from your income before the schedule is read; an allowance for your own other children living with you, which § 12-201(c)(1)(iii) allows where the child spends more than 92 overnights in your home, worked out by reading this same schedule at your income alone and taking 75 percent of the result under § 12-201(c)(2)(ii). Neither of the two we cannot collect can raise anybody's adjusted actual income, and Maryland's schedule never falls as income rises, so the basic obligation your calculation starts from is HIGHER than a Maryland court would reach wherever either of them applies.
- Your share of that obligation is the part we cannot put a direction on, and it is worth a sentence because it can pull the other way. § 12-204(a)(1) divides the obligation "in proportion to their adjusted actual incomes", so what you owe is set from BOTH parents' adjusted figures rather than from yours alone. Neither missing deduction scales with income: alimony actually paid is a fixed obligation, and the allowance for a parent's own other children is a second reading of this same schedule at that parent's income by itself, taken at 75 percent. So if it is the OTHER parent who pays alimony or supports a child at home, their adjusted income falls, the combined figure falls with it, and your share of what is left is bigger than the split we have used. Your own deductions and theirs push the answer opposite ways. This form asks about neither, so which case you are in is not something we can see. The obligation being shared is too high in every case; the share of it is the part we cannot put a direction on.
- Two categories of cost sit outside the figure above by Maryland's own structure. Extraordinary medical expenses are added to the obligation and divided by income share under § 12-204(h)(2), and § 12-201(g) defines them as uninsured medical costs over $250 in a calendar year, including orthodontia, dental and vision care, asthma treatment, physical therapy, treatment for a chronic health problem, and counselling or psychiatric therapy for a diagnosed mental disorder. Separately, § 12-204(i) lets private or special school expenses and the cost of transporting the children between your two homes be divided in the same proportion, "by agreement of the parties or by order of court" rather than automatically. This calculator has no field for either, so neither is in the number.
- The guideline figure is a presumption rather than a fixed amount. § 12-202(a)(2) makes the guidelines amount "the correct amount of child support to be awarded" unless a party shows that applying them "would be unjust or inappropriate in a particular case", and where a court departs it has to say so in writing and state what the guidelines would have produced. § 12-202(a)(2)(iii) lists what a court may weigh, including the terms of an existing settlement agreement, provisions for mortgages, marital debts or college expenses, and whether the order would leave the paying parent below 110 percent of the 2019 federal poverty level.
- The employment status you selected has not changed the estimate above. You had to answer to get here, and whichever answer you picked the figure is the same: we calculate on the income figures you entered and impute nothing to either parent. Courts can impute. Where a judge finds a parent voluntarily unemployed or under-employed, a court may set support on what that parent could earn rather than on what they currently bring in, and an imputed figure is set at or above actual earnings rather than below them. Which way that would move your case depends on whose income gets imputed, and that is the part we cannot answer for you: if it is the paying party's, the figure above tends to sit below what a court would order, and if it is the receiving party's it can move in either direction depending on the state and on the two incomes, so we do not put a direction on it. We have read the imputation provision in Illinois and in no other state, Maryland included, so nothing on this page is adjusted for one.
Example 3: Two children, higher-earning paying parent, insurance and childcare
The paying parent now earns considerably more, and carries the health insurance and work-related childcare, which are credited back against the obligation.
- Paying parent
- $12,000/mo
- Other parent
- $3,000/mo
- Children
- 2
- Overnights
- 80/yr
Guideline result: $2,226 per month ($26,712 a year).
| Step | Amount |
|---|---|
| Your monthly actual income | $12,000 |
| Other parent's monthly actual income | $3,000 |
| Combined adjusted actual income | $15,000 |
| Basic support obligation, schedule at $15,000 | $3,015 |
| Work-related childcare, added under § 12-204(g) | $650 |
| Health insurance for the children, added under § 12-204(h)(1) | $280 |
| Your share of the total obligation (80% of combined adjusted actual income) | $3,156 |
| Credit: the childcare and health insurance you pay directly (§ 12-204(l)(3)) | -$930 |
- This is Maryland's ordinary calculation under § 12-204(l): the basic obligation from the schedule, plus work-related childcare under § 12-204(g) and health insurance under § 12-204(h)(1), divided between the parents in proportion to their adjusted actual incomes. On 80 overnights a year with you the other parent has 285, and the lower of the two, 80, does not reach the 92 that § 12-201(o) requires of EACH parent before the shared physical custody calculation applies. You are close to that line: 12 more overnights for the parent with fewer would move the case onto a different calculation entirely, and Maryland phases that step in rather than dropping it all at once.
- One thing Maryland makes easier than most states on this site, and one thing it does not. The schedule is read at "combined adjusted actual income", which § 12-201(b) defines as income from any source with no tax taken out of it, so there is no converting your gross pay to a net figure and no substituting one for the other. Every state on this site whose guideline is keyed to net income carries a paragraph about which way that substitution pushes the figure, and this one does not need it. What § 12-201(c)(1) does subtract, and this form has a field for only the first of, is: support you already pay under another order; alimony or maintenance you actually pay, which § 12-201(c)(1)(ii) subtracts from your income before the schedule is read; an allowance for your own other children living with you, which § 12-201(c)(1)(iii) allows where the child spends more than 92 overnights in your home, worked out by reading this same schedule at your income alone and taking 75 percent of the result under § 12-201(c)(2)(ii). Neither of the two we cannot collect can raise anybody's adjusted actual income, and Maryland's schedule never falls as income rises, so the basic obligation your calculation starts from is HIGHER than a Maryland court would reach wherever either of them applies.
- Your share of that obligation is the part we cannot put a direction on, and it is worth a sentence because it can pull the other way. § 12-204(a)(1) divides the obligation "in proportion to their adjusted actual incomes", so what you owe is set from BOTH parents' adjusted figures rather than from yours alone. Neither missing deduction scales with income: alimony actually paid is a fixed obligation, and the allowance for a parent's own other children is a second reading of this same schedule at that parent's income by itself, taken at 75 percent. So if it is the OTHER parent who pays alimony or supports a child at home, their adjusted income falls, the combined figure falls with it, and your share of what is left is bigger than the split we have used. Your own deductions and theirs push the answer opposite ways. This form asks about neither, so which case you are in is not something we can see. The obligation being shared is too high in every case; the share of it is the part we cannot put a direction on.
- Two categories of cost sit outside the figure above by Maryland's own structure. Extraordinary medical expenses are added to the obligation and divided by income share under § 12-204(h)(2), and § 12-201(g) defines them as uninsured medical costs over $250 in a calendar year, including orthodontia, dental and vision care, asthma treatment, physical therapy, treatment for a chronic health problem, and counselling or psychiatric therapy for a diagnosed mental disorder. Separately, § 12-204(i) lets private or special school expenses and the cost of transporting the children between your two homes be divided in the same proportion, "by agreement of the parties or by order of court" rather than automatically. This calculator has no field for either, so neither is in the number.
- The guideline figure is a presumption rather than a fixed amount. § 12-202(a)(2) makes the guidelines amount "the correct amount of child support to be awarded" unless a party shows that applying them "would be unjust or inappropriate in a particular case", and where a court departs it has to say so in writing and state what the guidelines would have produced. § 12-202(a)(2)(iii) lists what a court may weigh, including the terms of an existing settlement agreement, provisions for mortgages, marital debts or college expenses, and whether the order would leave the paying parent below 110 percent of the 2019 federal poverty level.
- The employment status you selected has not changed the estimate above. You had to answer to get here, and whichever answer you picked the figure is the same: we calculate on the income figures you entered and impute nothing to either parent. Courts can impute. Where a judge finds a parent voluntarily unemployed or under-employed, a court may set support on what that parent could earn rather than on what they currently bring in, and an imputed figure is set at or above actual earnings rather than below them. Which way that would move your case depends on whose income gets imputed, and that is the part we cannot answer for you: if it is the paying party's, the figure above tends to sit below what a court would order, and if it is the receiving party's it can move in either direction depending on the state and on the two incomes, so we do not put a direction on it. We have read the imputation provision in Illinois and in no other state, Maryland included, so nothing on this page is adjusted for one.
Comparing the first two examples shows what a second child is worth in Maryland: the order moves from $763 to $1,093a month on identical incomes. The third example raises the paying parent's earnings and adds health insurance and childcare, which are credited back against the obligation rather than added on top of it.
How parenting time changes support in Maryland
Maryland adjusts support for parenting time, and we compute the adjustment, because we have read the rule out of the state's own published guidelines rather than inferring it. The mechanism is a cliff. Below 92 overnights the calculation runs on the ordinary calculation in § 12-204(l) and parenting time does not enter it at all. At 92 overnights it switches to the shared physical custody calculation in § 12-204(m), which multiplies the basic obligation by 1.5 under § 12-204(f), divides it between the parents in proportion to their adjusted actual incomes, and then multiplies each parent's share by the percentage of time the children spend with the other parent. The two figures are offset and the parent owing the greater amount pays the difference, which § 12-204(m)(5) then caps at what would have been owed under § 12-204(l). The figure steps at that boundary rather than sliding toward it, so a single night can be worth several hundred dollars a month.
The part that catches parents out is that BOTH parents have to clear 92 overnights, not just the one asking for the adjustment. Under Maryland law the shared route turns on each parent keeping the child or children overnight for more than 25% of the year, which the same statute glosses as at least 92 overnights. So a schedule that gives you far more than half the year can put you outside the shared route entirely, by leaving the other parent under the bar rather than by anything about your own count. If you are negotiating toward a particular number of overnights, check what the schedule leaves the other parent, not only what it gives you.
Note the wording of the boundary, because it is not the same in every cliff state and it decides cases that sit on it. Maryland's rule is each parent keeping the child or children overnight for more than 25% of the year, which the same statute glosses as at least 92 overnights, so a parent at exactly 92 qualifies. Other states word the same kind of rule as "more than", which excludes a parent sitting exactly on the number: West Virginia's threshold is 127 days and a parent with exactly 127 does not clear it. One night either side of a threshold is where contested schedules tend to end up, so it is worth reading your own state's phrasing rather than a summary of it.
Two further Maryland rules are worth knowing before you read the number above. Maryland softens its own cliff, and no other state on this site does. § 12-204(m)(2)(ii) increases the theoretical obligation of a parent sitting between 92 and 109 overnights, by 10 percent at 92 to 94 nights, then 8 at 95 to 98, 6 at 99 to 102, 4 at 103 to 105 and 2 at 106 to 109, and nothing from 110 up. So the step at the threshold is deliberately reduced rather than left where it falls, and the rungs are not evenly spaced. There is also a second condition on the shared route that no calculator can check: § 12-201(o)(1) requires that "both parents contribute to the expenses of the child or children in addition to the payment of child support", which is a finding about your household rather than a number.
Overnights are the second biggest lever after income, and they are the one parents most often underestimate. The reasoning is straightforward: a parent who has the children a third of the year is already paying for food, utilities, and a bedroom during that time, so the transfer payment to the other household falls to avoid charging twice for the same costs.
The table below runs one family through the Maryland guideline at 6 parenting-time levels. Income is held at $5,000 and $3,000 a month with two children, so the only thing changing between rows is the number of overnights. It follows Maryland's own published rule, and the state's worksheet linked below is still the document a court works from.
| Overnights | Arrangement | Monthly support | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 52 (14%) | Alternating weekends only | $1,093 | Baseline |
| 80 (22%) | Alternating weekends plus a midweek night | $1,093 | Baseline |
| 110 (30%) | Extended weekends and half of school breaks | $849 | -$244 |
| 146 (40%) | A 5-2-2-5 rotation, about 40 percent of nights | $590 | -$503 |
| 182 (50%) | Equal time, week on and week off | $331 | -$762 |
| 250 (68%) | The children with you most of the year, alternating weekends with the other parent | $0 | -$1,093 |
The size and the shape of that movement are what parenting-time disputes and support disputes are usually arguing about at the same time, in different clothing.
Where Maryland starts on parenting time
Maryland does not presume equal parenting time. That is our own record rather than Maryland's own custody law. Courts decide the schedule on the best interests of the children, so the overnight count is established case by case rather than assumed. Parents who expect substantial time should treat it as something to be negotiated deliberately, and the section above is what Maryland's own guidelines do with the count you end up with, which is worth reading before you agree to one.
Getting a child support order in Maryland
The guideline figure is only half the picture. When the order actually arrives, and what it costs to argue about it, vary quite a bit from state to state, and both shape what a family lives on in the meantime.
- Residency required
- 6 months
- Waiting period
- 6 months
- Typical uncontested
- 5 months
- Typical contested
- about 1.3 years
Support before the case is finished
You need 6 months of residency in Maryland before you can file, and a statutory period of 6 months has to run before a judge can finalize the divorce. States measure that period from different starting points, some from filing, some from service on your spouse, and some from the date the two of you separated, so confirm where Maryland's clock begins. A contested case in Maryland runs about 1.3 years on average, against 5 months when the parents agree. That gap is why temporary support matters. A judge can enter a temporary order early in the case, calculated on the same guideline, so the children are covered while the rest of the case is worked out. If money is tight now, a temporary order is usually the fastest relief available, and waiting for the final judgment can mean months without support.
What it costs to contest the number
Family law attorneys in Maryland typically run $250 to $500 an hour, and mediation costs roughly $275a session. Worth doing the arithmetic before digging in: a handful of billable hours on each side can cost more than a full year of the amount being argued over. Where the disagreement is genuinely large, or where one parent's income is hard to pin down, representation earns its keep. Where the gap between the two positions is a few dozen dollars a month, mediation or a negotiated agreement almost always leaves both households better off. Our record carries collaborative divorce as available in all fifty states, so it says nothing specific about Maryland; whether trained collaborative attorneys practise near you is a local question. Where it is on offer, both parents commit in writing to settle without litigation and use shared financial experts rather than competing ones.
Changing or enforcing a Maryland order
Modifying an existing order
A child support order is not permanent, but it also does not adjust on its own. Either parent can ask the court to recalculate, and the general standard across states is a substantial and continuing change in circumstances since the last order. Job loss, a significant raise, a change in the parenting schedule, a new child support obligation for another child, and a change in the children's medical or childcare costs are the changes that most often qualify.
Two points catch parents out. The first is that a modification usually takes effect from the date the request is filed, not the date the circumstances changed, so waiting to file means absorbing the gap. The second is that the obligation continues in full until a judge signs a new order. An informal agreement between parents to pay less does not bind the court, and arrears can still accrue against the paying parent for the difference.
Enforcement
Enforcement runs through Maryland's child support agency as well as the courts. Federal law requires every state to run a child support enforcement program with a common set of tools, which is why the remedies look broadly similar from state to state: income withholding straight from wages, interception of federal and state tax refunds, reporting to credit bureaus, suspension of driver's and professional licenses, liens against property, and contempt proceedings for willful non-payment. Income withholding is the default for new orders in most cases rather than a penalty applied after a missed payment.
Maryland guideline authority and official worksheet
The Maryland child support guideline in our data is:
- Md. Code, Fam. Law § 12-204
That authority controls, and the worksheet published under it is the document a court works from. The estimate on this page models the guideline, it does not replace the worksheet.
Maryland keeps the schedule and the rule for reading it in the same section. Md. Code, Fam. Law § 12-204(e) is the schedule of basic child support obligations, which runs to $30,000 of combined adjusted actual monthly income, and § 12-204(d) is the whole of what the statute says about incomes above it: "if the combined adjusted actual income exceeds the highest level specified in the schedule in subsection (e) of this section, the court may use its discretion in setting the amount of child support." One sentence, no minimum, no cap, and no direction to carry the schedule further.
The current schedule took effect on July 1, 2022, under 2021 HB 1339, Chapter 305. It replaced one that ran only to $15,000 of combined income, half the current top, so anything written before that date describes a different table. A 2020 Maryland appellate opinion still describes the schedule as ending at $15,000, which is one way to date the change and not the only one: the General Assembly publishes a compilation of this section for each legislative session, the 2022 one carries the note "TAKES EFFECT JULY 1 2022 PER CHAPTER 305 OF 2021" above the schedule, and it prints the old table and the new one together.
Two bills you will find if you go looking, and neither is the schedule. 2020 HB 946 and 2020 SB 847 are both titled "Child Support - Guidelines" and both took effect October 1, 2021, which puts them right where you would expect the schedule's authority to be. They are the poverty-level bills, which let a court weigh whether an order would leave the paying parent below 110 percent of the 2019 federal poverty level. Maryland's own 2021 session compilation attaches their chapter numbers to § 12-204 with that date on the face of the document, so this is an easy pair to cite by mistake.
How Maryland reads its own table is set out in § 12-204(c), and it is not what most states do: "if a combined adjusted actual income amount falls between amounts shown in the schedule, the basic child support amount shall be extrapolated to the next higher amount." Nothing is averaged between two rows. An income that falls between them takes the HIGHER row's figure, so the amount steps up at each row rather than sliding. Rows are $50 apart across the whole schedule.
Where to get the official worksheet
Every state publishes a child support worksheet or an official calculator, and that document is what a judge or the state agency works from. We do not yet have a verified direct link to Maryland's worksheet, so the starting points below are the state's own court site and the federal directory of state child support agencies rather than a deep link we cannot vouch for.
- Maryland courts , the state judiciary site from our Maryland source record.
- Office of Child Support Services, U.S. Administration for Children and Families, which maintains the directory of state child support agencies.
- National Conference of State Legislatures, child support guideline models by state, which publishes its own comparison of the guideline model each state uses, so you can check ours against it.
Child Support in Maryland - Frequently Asked Questions
How is child support calculated in Maryland?
Maryland uses the Income Shares Model to calculate child support, and we have read the guideline that says so. Both parents' incomes are combined, and each parent's share of the total obligation is proportional to their share of the combined income. The figure Maryland's own guideline works from is combined adjusted actual income, under Md. Code, Fam. Law § 12-201(b), (c) and (f).
Does Maryland use the income shares model?
Yes. Maryland is an income shares state, which is the model used by the large majority of states. Both parents' incomes are combined, a total support obligation is set from that combined figure and the number of children, and each parent is responsible for the share that matches their portion of the combined income. The parent the children live with most is treated as spending their share directly, so only the other parent's share becomes a payment.
How do overnights affect child support in Maryland?
They change it, and the calculator on this page changes with them, because we have read Maryland's own rule rather than inferring one. Maryland law switches the calculation onto a different route once the parenting time reaches a set threshold, and the figure steps at that boundary rather than sliding toward it. The catch worth knowing before you plan around it is that BOTH parents have to clear the line, not only the one asking for the adjustment, so a schedule giving one parent far more than half the year can put the case outside the shared route entirely. Move the overnight slider above and you will see the figure change. The parenting time section on this page sets out the threshold, the wording of the boundary and what happens either side of it.
How much is child support for 2 children in Maryland?
It depends on the incomes involved, so there is no single figure. As a worked example, two children with the paying parent earning $5,000 gross a month, the other parent earning $3,000, and a standard 80-overnight schedule produces an estimate of $1,093 a month ($13,116 a year) under Maryland's guideline. Change the incomes and the number moves. So does changing the overnights, because Maryland's own parenting-time rule is read from the state's guideline and applied here. Run your own figures in the calculator on this page.
Can child support be modified in Maryland?
Yes. Either parent can request a child support modification if there has been a substantial change in circumstances, such as a significant change in income, change in custody arrangements, or changes in the child's needs. Courts in Maryland typically require a change of at least 15-20% in the support amount to justify modification.
Does custody arrangement affect child support in Maryland?
Yes, twice over: it sets which parent pays, and it changes the amount. Maryland's own rule for how it changes the amount is read from the state's guideline and applied in the calculator on this page, so the arrangement you enter moves the figure rather than leaving it standing. The parenting time section above sets out what the rule actually turns on, which is worth reading before you agree to a schedule: in a threshold state it is usually the count each parent is left with rather than the count either one is given.
Is there an income cap for child support in Maryland?
Not a cap, and not a floor either, which makes Maryland unusual. $30,000 of combined adjusted actual monthly income is where the schedule at Md. Code, Fam. Law § 12-204(e) ends, and § 12-204(d) is the whole of what the statute says about incomes above it: the court "may use its discretion in setting the amount of child support." That is one sentence, and it points in no direction at all. Most states with a schedule that stops do one of two things above it, and Maryland does neither: Colorado, Illinois and Washington make the top row a minimum a court may exceed, while New Mexico, Virginia, Florida and Pennsylvania publish a formula that carries the guideline upward. Because the discretion runs both ways here, we cannot honestly tell you which side of the figure on this page a court is likely to land on, and we are not going to guess. For one child the top row is $3,163 a month for the whole family before it is divided between the parents by income share. Check the units before comparing with another state: this is COMBINED income, not one parent's, and § 12-201 defines "adjusted actual income" as income from any source less three specific obligations, with no tax taken out, so it is a pre-tax figure and not net pay. If your combined income is above the line, that is a case worth putting to a Maryland family law attorney, because a decision made on discretion this wide turns on its own facts rather than on the guideline. The schedule itself took effect on July 1, 2022, and it has been unchanged in every session compilation the General Assembly has published since.
How long does child support last in Maryland?
Child support in Maryland typically continues until the child turns 18 or graduates from high school, whichever is later. Support may continue longer if the child has a disability or if the parents agree to extend support for college expenses.
This estimate is for planning purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. Consult a licensed family law attorney in your state for guidance specific to your situation.
How we calculate this estimate
We apply the guideline model your state actually uses, and the models differ more than most summaries suggest. Most states follow the Income Shares Model: both parents' monthly incomes are combined, a basic support obligation is drawn from that combined figure and the number of children, and each parent covers the share that matches their portion of the combined income. Which income figure gets combined is the state's own to define and it is not the same one everywhere, so this page names it for your state where the guideline has been read and does not guess at it where it has not. Percentage of Income states apply a set rate to the paying parent's income alone, and Nevada's tiered version steps that rate down across income brackets. The Melson Formula reserves a self-support amount for each parent before dividing what is left. Some states do neither: North Dakota reads a dollar figure off a table keyed to one parent's net income, and California publishes a single algebraic formula with no schedule behind it. Which one your state is on is named on its own page rather than inferred from a list here. Credits for health insurance and childcare are applied where the state's own guideline builds them into the order, along with any income cap the state sets, and the list of what moves the number on each state's page names the levers that actually move that state's figure. Parenting time is computed in the states whose own guideline we have read and implemented, and in no others.
What the estimate assumes for Maryland
- Income figures are gross monthly, before taxes, counting the sources your state includes.
- Parenting time moves the figure only where we have read and implemented the state's own rule. The parenting-time section further down this page says which case this state is in, and where no adjustment applies the estimate is the amount before one. We previously reduced support past 146 overnights on a coefficient of our own. 146 turned out to be a single state's statutory threshold applied to all fifty, the size of the reduction had no legal source anywhere, and the mechanisms states actually use are not variations on one rule. Among the ones we have now read: a worksheet that switches at a threshold both parents must clear, an offset applied continuously with no trigger, a threshold that does nothing below it and slides above it, a term written into the guideline formula itself so there is no unadjusted amount at all, no parenting-time term anywhere, and a formula prescribed by statute whose text we do not have. That list is what we have read rather than what exists, and it has grown with every state checked. We removed ours rather than defaulting it, and we publish each state's adjustment as that state's own rule is verified.
- North Carolina is one of the verified threshold cases, at 123 overnights under the guidelines adopted pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 50-13.4(c1). The threshold has to be cleared by both parents, which is why a parent well past an even split can fall outside shared care entirely.
- Texas has no parenting-time adjustment at all, because its guideline has none. Tex. Fam. Code 154.125 runs on the obligor's net resources and the number of children, and the state's own calculator has no field for overnights. Possession time enters only as a discretionary deviation factor, Tex. Fam. Code 154.123(b)(4).
- Georgia has a mandatory parenting-time adjustment whose formula we do not have. O.C.G.A. 19-6-15(g), effective January 1 2026, requires the court to adjust the noncustodial parent's basic obligation wherever there is a court-ordered parenting time schedule, with the result entered on Child Support Schedule C. Applying arithmetic of our own in place of a prescribed formula would be worse than applying none, so the Georgia estimate is the presumptive amount before that adjustment.
- Where a state's own schedule has been transcribed, the basic obligation is read straight off it. Where it has not, the figure comes from a national approximation of the tables courts read from, and the source panel on that state's page says which of the two you are looking at. That approximation has been measured against the seven transcribed schedules keyed to the same thing it is, at 546 income and family-size combinations. It missed them by 32 to 86 percent on average, and it missed them in both directions at once: at every income from $1,500 to $6,000 of combined monthly income it came in under at least one of those schedules and over another, then above all seven from $8,000 up, reaching 69 to 240 percent above those states' own tables at $30,000. So a modeled figure at a high combined income is the least reliable number this calculator returns, and near $6,000 is where the approximation lands closest.
- Where a state sets an income ceiling, we clamp income at it. That is a fair model of a real cap and a poor one of everything else, so two states are handled differently. New York's $193,000 of combined parental income is the point above which a court may consider the additional income, not a limit on what it can order, and our figure there is the amount the guideline produces at the threshold. New Jersey's Appendix IX-F schedule ends at $3,600 of combined weekly net income, and courts are instructed in capital letters not to extrapolate past it, so we read the obligation at the schedule's last row and treat the result as the minimum basic support award rather than as a guideline amount. Appendix IX-A requires a New Jersey court to add to that minimum from the income above the ceiling. Modeling what a court adds is not something we can do honestly, because it turns on statutory factors rather than on arithmetic. Above the New Jersey line our figure is therefore a floor, and above the New York line it is not one: the addition New Jersey requires is what makes its schedule figure a minimum, and no New York instrument says an award may not come in below the amount at the threshold. Both figures read as the low end of a realistic range and only one of them is a floor a reader can count on.
- The same schedule can also stop short at the bottom. New Jersey publishes no award figure below $180 of combined weekly net income, where the court sets the amount from the paying parent's income and living expenses within a published range. Our estimate at that income is a modeled figure with nothing from the state to check it against, and it says so.
- The result is a guideline number. Judges can deviate from it when the facts justify a different amount.
Where the estimate stops
Your state's official worksheet is the controlling document, and a court order can land somewhere other than any guideline estimate. Use this to prepare, then confirm the figure with a licensed family law attorney or your state's child support agency.
Read the full methodology for how every calculator on the site is built.
Sources
Maryland courts and statutes
- mdcourts.gov
- Md. Code, Family Law § 7-103 (2023 reform); standard 6-month separation path (mutual-consent path has no wait)
- Md. Code, Family Law § 7-101 (6-month residency requirement)
- Md. Code, Fam. Law § 12-204
- Md. Code, Fam. Law § 12-201 (definitions); § 12-202 (rebuttable presumption)
Where to read more
Background reading, not where the figures above came from. No number on this page is taken from any of these.
About this page

Written by Barron Hansen
I am an app developer who is dedicated to building the highest-value, most accurate web apps possible, that people want to use every day.