North Dakota Child Support Calculator

How North Dakota calculates child support

North Dakota sets child support with the Published Schedule on the Paying Parent's Income, and we have read the guideline that says so, which means a dollar amount is read off a published table at the paying parent's own net income and the number of children, with no percentage and no combining of incomes. Here is what that looks like in practice.

This model does not calculate a figure so much as look one up. The state publishes a table with a row for each level of the paying parent's monthly net income and a column for each number of children, and the order is the dollar amount where the row and the column meet. There is no percentage anywhere in it, and the receiving parent's income does not enter the arithmetic at all. Two families with the same paying parent and very different second incomes get the same guideline number.

What makes the table harder to use than a percentage is that the income it is keyed to is not the income on anyone's pay stub. The guidelines define a net figure of their own and set out exactly how to reach it: gross income, less a hypothetical federal income tax worked out at single filing status whatever your real status is, less a state income tax fixed at a percentage of that federal figure, less Social Security and Medicare. What your employer actually withholds is irrelevant. The resulting figure is then rounded to the nearest table row before the lookup, so the amount steps at each row rather than sliding, and nothing is interpolated between rows.

Both ends of the table are answers rather than edges, which is unusual. The bottom row covers everything at or below its income, and the top row covers everything at or above its own, so the obligation stops rising past a certain point instead of the table simply running out. Departures from the figure are possible but they are grounds to be argued on evidence rather than automatic credits, and the list of grounds is published alongside the table.

The figure North Dakota's own guideline works from is the obligor's monthly net income, under N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-01(6).

What moves the number in North Dakota

• The paying parent's income, converted to the guidelines' own net figure (the receiving parent's income is not part of the formula)
• Number of children covered by the order, up to the last column of the table
• Court-ordered overnights with the paying parent, once they pass the state's threshold
• Health insurance for the children, under a rule this estimate does not apply
• Support already ordered for children from another relationship, under a rule this estimate does not apply

Income limits and judicial discretion

North Dakota's schedule has a last row headed "$25,000 or more", so the obligation stops rising there and stays flat at every income above it. That is not the same as a table running out: the row prices those incomes rather than declining to, so a parent well above the line is being shown the guideline's own answer. Check the units before comparing it with anywhere else, because two of them are unusual. It is ONE parent's income rather than the two combined, and it is that parent's NET income on a definition the guidelines write themselves rather than gross pay. Above the line § 75-02-04.1-09(2)(b) lets a court depart upward on "the increased ability of an obligor, with a monthly net income which exceeds twenty-five thousand dollars, to provide additional child support based on demonstrated needs of the child", so the flat figure is a floor and clearing it takes demonstrated need rather than a large income. North Dakota gives judges a moderate amount of room on custody and parenting time, so expect the order to start from the guideline figure and move with the facts of the case.

North Dakota child support examples

These three examples run through the same North Dakota calculator on this page, so the figures match what the tool returns for the same entries. Each example changes one thing against the one before it, so you can see which lever moved the result. All three assume a standard schedule of 80 overnights a year with the paying parent, and North Dakota's own parenting-time rule is applied to every figure below rather than left off it. At this count the rule does not reach, so these are complete guideline amounts rather than amounts waiting for an adjustment. The table further down the page is where the count starts to move the number, and it shows where.

Comparing the first two examples shows what a second child is worth in North Dakota: the order moves from $780 to $1,188a month on identical incomes. The third example raises the paying parent's earnings and adds health insurance and childcare, which are credited back against the obligation rather than added on top of it.

How parenting time changes support in North Dakota

North Dakota adjusts support for parenting time, we compute the adjustment, and the mechanism is one this site has not met before: a threshold with a slide after it. Below the line nothing happens at all. N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-08.1 reaches only parenting time "scheduled by court order to exceed an annual total of 100 overnights", so a paying parent with 100 nights or fewer gets exactly the schedule figure and moving the overnight slider below that point does nothing, because the guideline does nothing.

Cross the line and the drop is immediate rather than gradual. At 101 overnights the obligation goes straight to about 91.1 percent of the schedule amount, so a single night is worth roughly nine percent of the order. That is the step. After it the adjustment slides: each child's overnights are multiplied by 0.32, the result is taken away from 365, and the remainder over 365 is the fraction of that child's share still owed. By an even split at 182 nights the figure is down to about 84.0 percent. The table above shows the step and the slide together, and the jump between the third and fourth rows is the boundary.

Two things about the threshold that decide real cases. It EXCLUDES ITSELF: "exceed" means a parent with exactly 100 overnights does not qualify and one with 101 does, which is the way West Virginia words its threshold and the opposite of Illinois's "146 or more" and North Carolina's "at least 123 nights". And it turns on what the ORDER says rather than on what happens. The phrase is "scheduled by court order", so the count that matters is the one your parenting plan provides for, and a parent who informally has the children more than their order gives them has not crossed anything.

Only YOUR count is tested, which is the opposite of most states with a threshold. In North Carolina, Illinois, West Virginia and New Mexico both parents have to clear the bar, so a schedule giving one parent far more than half the year can take the case out of the shared route entirely by leaving the other parent below it. North Dakota does not work that way: N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-08.1 looks at the obligor's overnights and stops. There is no counter-intuitive drop at the top of the table here, and nothing to check about what the schedule leaves the other parent, at least not for this purpose.

One North Dakota rule can switch the whole adjustment off, and it is not a number of nights. Where a court has ordered EQUAL RESIDENTIAL RESPONSIBILITY, N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-08.1(3) says an adjustment for extended parenting time "is not authorized", and N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-08.2 replaces the calculation instead: each parent's obligation is worked out as though the other had primary residential responsibility, and the smaller is subtracted from the larger. That is a status in your order rather than something a calculator can see, so two parents can enter the same number of overnights here and be governed by different provisions. If your order uses those words, the figures in the table above are not your calculation.

A last note on the form the threshold takes, because North Dakota states it one way only. The chapter gives a count of overnights and no percentage of the year anywhere. 100 overnights is about 27.4 percent of a 365-day year, and that division is ours. If you meet a North Dakota threshold quoted as a percentage, somebody has done the same arithmetic and presented the answer as the state's rule. New Mexico is the exact mirror, stating a percentage with no count behind it, and Alaska is a third case again, stating a percentage in its rule while the court publishes a count in documents it has not adopted.

Overnights are the second biggest lever after income, and they are the one parents most often underestimate. The reasoning is straightforward: a parent who has the children a third of the year is already paying for food, utilities, and a bedroom during that time, so the transfer payment to the other household falls to avoid charging twice for the same costs.

The table below runs one family through the North Dakota guideline at 6 parenting-time levels. Income is held at $5,000 and $3,000 a month with two children, so the only thing changing between rows is the number of overnights. It follows North Dakota's own published rule, and the state's worksheet linked below is still the document a court works from.

The size and the shape of that movement are what parenting-time disputes and support disputes are usually arguing about at the same time, in different clothing.

Where North Dakota starts on parenting time

North Dakota does not presume equal parenting time. That is our own record rather than North Dakota's own custody law. Courts decide the schedule on the best interests of the children, so the overnight count is established case by case rather than assumed. Parents who expect substantial time should treat it as something to be negotiated deliberately, and the section above is what North Dakota's own guidelines do with the count you end up with, which is worth reading before you agree to one.

Getting a child support order in North Dakota

The guideline figure is only half the picture. When the order actually arrives, and what it costs to argue about it, vary quite a bit from state to state, and both shape what a family lives on in the meantime.

Residency required

6 months

Waiting period

None

Typical uncontested

3 months

Typical contested

9 months

Support before the case is finished

You need 6 months of residency in North Dakota before you can file, and no statutory waiting period applies before a judge can finalize the divorce. A contested case in North Dakota runs 9 months on average, against 3 months when the parents agree. That gap is why temporary support matters. A judge can enter a temporary order early in the case, calculated on the same guideline, so the children are covered while the rest of the case is worked out. If money is tight now, a temporary order is usually the fastest relief available, and waiting for the final judgment can mean months without support.

What it costs to contest the number

Family law attorneys in North Dakota typically run $175 to $325 an hour, and mediation costs roughly $200a session. Worth doing the arithmetic before digging in: a handful of billable hours on each side can cost more than a full year of the amount being argued over. Where the disagreement is genuinely large, or where one parent's income is hard to pin down, representation earns its keep. Where the gap between the two positions is a few dozen dollars a month, mediation or a negotiated agreement almost always leaves both households better off. Our record carries collaborative divorce as available in all fifty states, so it says nothing specific about North Dakota; whether trained collaborative attorneys practise near you is a local question. Where it is on offer, both parents commit in writing to settle without litigation and use shared financial experts rather than competing ones.

Changing or enforcing a North Dakota order

Modifying an existing order

A child support order is not permanent, but it also does not adjust on its own. Either parent can ask the court to recalculate, and the general standard across states is a substantial and continuing change in circumstances since the last order. Job loss, a significant raise, a change in the parenting schedule, a new child support obligation for another child, and a change in the children's medical or childcare costs are the changes that most often qualify.

Two points catch parents out. The first is that a modification usually takes effect from the date the request is filed, not the date the circumstances changed, so waiting to file means absorbing the gap. The second is that the obligation continues in full until a judge signs a new order. An informal agreement between parents to pay less does not bind the court, and arrears can still accrue against the paying parent for the difference.

Enforcement

Enforcement runs through North Dakota's child support agency as well as the courts. Federal law requires every state to run a child support enforcement program with a common set of tools, which is why the remedies look broadly similar from state to state: income withholding straight from wages, interception of federal and state tax refunds, reporting to credit bureaus, suspension of driver's and professional licenses, liens against property, and contempt proceedings for willful non-payment. Income withholding is the default for new orders in most cases rather than a penalty applied after a missed payment.

North Dakota guideline authority and official worksheet

North Dakota carries its child support guideline across more than one instrument, and all of them are in our data:

• N.D. Admin. Code ch. 75-02-04.1
• N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-10

Those authorities control, and the worksheet published under them is the document a court works from. The estimate on this page models the guideline, it does not replace the worksheet.

North Dakota publishes a dollar schedule rather than percentages. § 75-02-04.1-10 has a row for each $100 of the paying parent's monthly net income, from "$800 or less" to "$25,000 or more", and a column for one child through six or more. The obligation is read off it rather than calculated as a share of anything. Any source giving you a flat North Dakota percentage is describing a different kind of rule from the one the state has, and this site served exactly that mistake until the chapter was read.

Two dates sit on this document and only one of them belongs to the figures. The chapter is stamped "amended effective July 1, 2023", and § 75-02-04.1-10 carries its own history line ending January 1, 2019. The 2023 rulemaking reached the definitions, the imputation rules, the rebuttal criteria and the foster care provisions and left every number in the table alone. So the amounts have stood since January 1, 2019, and a description of this as a 2023 schedule is reading the cover.

One thing to check before comparing a North Dakota figure with anywhere else: the income the table is keyed to is defined by the guidelines rather than by your pay stub. § 75-02-04.1-01(6) builds a hypothetical net figure, deducting a federal income tax computed at single filing status whatever your real status is, a state income tax fixed at eleven percent of that federal number, and Social Security and Medicare. Actual withholding is expressly irrelevant. A "North Dakota net income" is therefore a term of art, and two people with identical take-home pay can have different ones.

There is no minimum order here, and that is a repeal rather than an omission. N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-04, "Minimum Support Level", was repealed with effect from January 1, 2018, and the bottom row of the schedule reads zero in all six columns. North Dakota is the only state on this site that got rid of one. Any minimum you find quoted for North Dakota predates 2018.

Where to get the official worksheet

Every state publishes a child support worksheet or an official calculator, and that document is what a judge or the state agency works from. We do not yet have a verified direct link to North Dakota's worksheet, so the starting points below are the state's own court site and the federal directory of state child support agencies rather than a deep link we cannot vouch for.

• North Dakota courts , the state judiciary site from our North Dakota source record.
• Office of Child Support Services, U.S. Administration for Children and Families, which maintains the directory of state child support agencies.
• National Conference of State Legislatures, child support guideline models by state, which publishes its own comparison of the guideline model each state uses, so you can check ours against it.

How we calculate this estimate

We apply the guideline model your state actually uses, and the models differ more than most summaries suggest. Most states follow the Income Shares Model: both parents' monthly incomes are combined, a basic support obligation is drawn from that combined figure and the number of children, and each parent covers the share that matches their portion of the combined income. Which income figure gets combined is the state's own to define and it is not the same one everywhere, so this page names it for your state where the guideline has been read and does not guess at it where it has not. Percentage of Income states apply a set rate to the paying parent's income alone, and Nevada's tiered version steps that rate down across income brackets. The Melson Formula reserves a self-support amount for each parent before dividing what is left. Some states do neither: North Dakota reads a dollar figure off a table keyed to one parent's net income, and California publishes a single algebraic formula with no schedule behind it. Which one your state is on is named on its own page rather than inferred from a list here. Credits for health insurance and childcare are applied where the state's own guideline builds them into the order, along with any income cap the state sets, and the list of what moves the number on each state's page names the levers that actually move that state's figure. Parenting time is computed in the states whose own guideline we have read and implemented, and in no others.

What the estimate assumes for North Dakota

• Income figures are gross monthly, before taxes, counting the sources your state includes.
• Parenting time moves the figure only where we have read and implemented the state's own rule. The parenting-time section further down this page says which case this state is in, and where no adjustment applies the estimate is the amount before one. We previously reduced support past 146 overnights on a coefficient of our own. 146 turned out to be a single state's statutory threshold applied to all fifty, the size of the reduction had no legal source anywhere, and the mechanisms states actually use are not variations on one rule. Among the ones we have now read: a worksheet that switches at a threshold both parents must clear, an offset applied continuously with no trigger, a threshold that does nothing below it and slides above it, a term written into the guideline formula itself so there is no unadjusted amount at all, no parenting-time term anywhere, and a formula prescribed by statute whose text we do not have. That list is what we have read rather than what exists, and it has grown with every state checked. We removed ours rather than defaulting it, and we publish each state's adjustment as that state's own rule is verified.
• North Carolina is one of the verified threshold cases, at 123 overnights under the guidelines adopted pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 50-13.4(c1). The threshold has to be cleared by both parents, which is why a parent well past an even split can fall outside shared care entirely.
• Texas has no parenting-time adjustment at all, because its guideline has none. Tex. Fam. Code 154.125 runs on the obligor's net resources and the number of children, and the state's own calculator has no field for overnights. Possession time enters only as a discretionary deviation factor, Tex. Fam. Code 154.123(b)(4).
• Georgia has a mandatory parenting-time adjustment whose formula we do not have. O.C.G.A. 19-6-15(g), effective January 1 2026, requires the court to adjust the noncustodial parent's basic obligation wherever there is a court-ordered parenting time schedule, with the result entered on Child Support Schedule C. Applying arithmetic of our own in place of a prescribed formula would be worse than applying none, so the Georgia estimate is the presumptive amount before that adjustment.
• Where a state's own schedule has been transcribed, the basic obligation is read straight off it. Where it has not, the figure comes from a national approximation of the tables courts read from, and the source panel on that state's page says which of the two you are looking at. That approximation has been measured against the seven transcribed schedules keyed to the same thing it is, at 546 income and family-size combinations. It missed them by 32 to 86 percent on average, and it missed them in both directions at once: at every income from $1,500 to $6,000 of combined monthly income it came in under at least one of those schedules and over another, then above all seven from $8,000 up, reaching 69 to 240 percent above those states' own tables at $30,000. So a modeled figure at a high combined income is the least reliable number this calculator returns, and near $6,000 is where the approximation lands closest.
• Where a state sets an income ceiling, we clamp income at it. That is a fair model of a real cap and a poor one of everything else, so two states are handled differently. New York's $193,000 of combined parental income is the point above which a court may consider the additional income, not a limit on what it can order, and our figure there is the amount the guideline produces at the threshold. New Jersey's Appendix IX-F schedule ends at $3,600 of combined weekly net income, and courts are instructed in capital letters not to extrapolate past it, so we read the obligation at the schedule's last row and treat the result as the minimum basic support award rather than as a guideline amount. Appendix IX-A requires a New Jersey court to add to that minimum from the income above the ceiling. Modeling what a court adds is not something we can do honestly, because it turns on statutory factors rather than on arithmetic. Above the New Jersey line our figure is therefore a floor, and above the New York line it is not one: the addition New Jersey requires is what makes its schedule figure a minimum, and no New York instrument says an award may not come in below the amount at the threshold. Both figures read as the low end of a realistic range and only one of them is a floor a reader can count on.
• The same schedule can also stop short at the bottom. New Jersey publishes no award figure below $180 of combined weekly net income, where the court sets the amount from the paying parent's income and living expenses within a published range. Our estimate at that income is a modeled figure with nothing from the state to check it against, and it says so.
• The result is a guideline number. Judges can deviate from it when the facts justify a different amount.

Where the estimate stops

Your state's official worksheet is the controlling document, and a court order can land somewhere other than any guideline estimate. Use this to prepare, then confirm the figure with a licensed family law attorney or your state's child support agency.

Read the full methodology for how every calculator on the site is built.

Sources

North Dakota courts and statutes

• ndcourts.gov
• ND SB 2057 / NDCC 27-05.2-03 (uniform $160 filing fee, effective July 1, 2025)
• N.D. Admin. Code ch. 75-02-04.1
• N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-10
• N.D. Admin. Code § 75-02-04.1-08.1

Where to read more

Background reading, not where the figures above came from. No number on this page is taken from any of these.

• National Conference of State Legislatures, child support guideline models by state
• Office of Child Support Services, U.S. Administration for Children and Families
• American Bar Association, Section of Family Law

About this page

Written by Barron Hansen

I am an app developer who is dedicated to building the highest-value, most accurate web apps possible, that people want to use every day.